Behavioral Therapy

Behavioral Therapy

This blog is part of the series for my reflections on studying different therapy theories. For any citing or quotation, please email nicoyu.w@gmail.com “Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take anyone at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select — doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors.” (Watson, J.B., 1930) This famous quote says a lot of the fundamental belief of Behavioral Theory: the environment shapes individuals; different personalities, characteristics, and even preferences are results of learning. Learning happens in forms: classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and social observations. From this concept, behavioral therapy sees the nature of human suffering as a series of maladaptive beliefs or behaviors from experiences, and they can be corrected or unconditioned. The most famous example of classical conditioning is Pavlov’s dog; the dog salivated when it heard the bell rang after the repeated association of the sound and the present of food. Applying the concept of learning, a person who suffers from social anxiety can be due to multiple social distress or be laughed at in the family at a young age; this individual associate giving opinion in public or talking to stranger with the feeling of inferior, the worry of providing wrong answers, and hence the anxious feeling.

Little Albert — Dr. Watson’s famous experiment

Because the objectivity in the view of all personal issue or sufferings is due to the maladaptive behavior or thinking, there are many empirical support techniques for supporting Behavioural Therapy, including mindfulness, desensitization, flooding, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Dialectic Behavioural Therapy (DBT). Most of the technique can be groups into two categories: the first category introduces the mindfulness and relaxation skill to the client, and then gradually place the source of anxiety in the plate, and the client would apply the relaxation or mindfulness technique to stay calm while the cause of stress is at present. The other group of methods, such as DBT and ACT, help people become aware of thoughts or feelings and accept them instead of being self-critical or self-punitive. As a beginning therapist, I can see the massive benefit of applying behavioral therapy techniques: it provides immediate resolutions for clients to improve the quality of life. However, the biggest critique of Behavioral therapy is that this approach works as a bandaid — it covers the wound and helps the skin to heal, but the infections deep down are not touched nor treated. Changing a maladaptive behavior or thought might improve the immediate problem, such as be able to remain calm in a social setting or identify suicidal thoughts and stop it. However, without knowing the actual reason why this person is suffering, more issues would surface in the same or different form in the future. Take the same social anxiety example mentioned earlier, teaching this person how to relax in the social setting or how to communicate with friends and family, might solve the immediate problem, which is to improve the communication with other people; however, this anxiety might come back when the individual’s family accidentally reject his idea again. As a beginning therapist, I would apply behavioral techniques with humanistic theory. With the person-centered and Gestalt therapeutic approach, I can see how clients and I can work together to explore the problems and to understand the underlying reasons why he or she is suffering. However, it will be a very long process, and I have concerns to leave a client hanging there while we open his or her wound, but the current therapy session has finished. Adding some techniques from behavioral therapy, I can provide easy access tools, like mindfulness skill and DBT, for the client to practice outside the therapy session, and to provide psychoeducation to clients and their family. With the behavioral interventions, I can feel assured that clients would able to deal with everyday anxiety or depression, while we spend more time on digging the deeper issue. Published on Notion


References Corey, G. (2017). /Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy: Student Manual (10th edition)./ Boston: Cengage Learning https://www.notion.so/happymind/Humanistic-approach-Existentialist-Person-Centered-Gestalt-Therapy-54a364118ecc47c8bbe7510ca2658637#ced13142b2ff431caf90fb5ffe9d042fhttps://www.notion.so/happymind/Humanistic-approach-Existentialist-Person-Centered-Gestalt-Therapy-54a364118ecc47c8bbe7510ca2658637#ced13142b2ff431caf90fb5ffe9d042f

Read more

打破情感操縱的模式(三)情感勒索

打破情感操縱的模式(三)情感勒索

最後,我們來討論一下情感勒索。情感勒索(Emotional blackmail)是一種操縱和控制他人的心理手段,通常發生在親密關係中。情感勒索的施加者利用受害者的恐懼、義務和罪惡感來操縱他們的行為,迫使他們屈服於自己的需求。 情感勒索通常表現為以下行為: * 威脅:施加者可能威脅要傷害自己、受害者或他們之間的關係,以迫使受害者屈服。 * 責任轉嫁:施加者可能將自己的需求和期望強加給受害者,讓他們感到負擔和壓力。 * 貶低和羞辱:施加者可能貶低或羞辱受害者,讓他們感到自卑和無能為力。 * 訴諸救贖:施加者可能利用受害者的善良和同情心,讓他們為自己的需求和問題負責。 你正在被情感勒索的徵兆: * 頻繁的恐懼、義務和罪惡感:受害者可能經常感到害怕、有責任感或罪惡感,因為他們無法滿足施加者的需求。 * 感覺被操縱:受害者可能意識到他們的行為受到施加者的操縱,但無法抵抗。 * 自我懷疑:受害者可能懷疑自己的判斷和能力,並將施加者的需求置於自己的需求之上。 如何應對情感勒索: * 增強自尊和自信:建立自尊和自信有助於抵禪操縱和操控,並讓你更容易維護自己的界限。

打破情感操縱的模式(二)PUA

打破情感操縱的模式(二)PUA

PUA是一種心理操縱手段,通常用於吸引異性並建立關係。PUA起源於20世紀90年代,最初是作為一種自助方法來幫助男性提高他們在戀愛市場上的競爭力。隨著時間的推移,這種方法演變成了一種更具操縱性的技巧。 PUA通常使用以下技巧來操縱目標對象: * 輕度侮辱(Negging):通過微妙的侮辱或打擊他人的自尊心,使對方產生不安全感,從而讓他們更願意接受操縱者的關注。 * 示弱(False Disqualifying):表現出一種不擅長某些事物的姿態,以引起目標對象的同情和支持。 * 快速升級:在相對短的時間內迅速建立親密關係,使對方感到與操縱者之間的關係正在快速發展。 應對戀愛技巧: * 識別PUA技巧:了解PUA技巧,以便在遇到時能夠識別並避免受到操縱。 * 保持自尊和自信:自尊和自信有助於抵禦操縱,並讓你更容易維護自己的界限。 * 設立界限:明確設定自己的界限,並堅定地告訴施加者你不容許這種行為。 你遇到PUA大師了嗎? 假設今天A想要追B,以下是一些常見的PUA技巧: 1. 增強吸引力:A可能會努力改善自己的外表、穿著打扮、言談舉止,以提高自己的吸引力

打破情感操縱的模式(ㄧ)煤氣燈

打破情感操縱的模式(ㄧ)煤氣燈

你知道自己可能正在被身邊親近的人操縱嗎?了解煤氣燈、PUA還有情緒勒索。 在現實生活中,人們可能會遇到各種心理操縱手段,例如煤氣燈效應(Gaslighting)、戀愛技巧(Pick-up Artist,縮寫為PUA)和情感勒索(Emotional blackmail)。在本文中,我們將簡要介紹這三種心理操縱手段,以幫助你更好地認識和應對這些情況。 煤氣燈效應 煤氣燈效應是一種心理操縱手段,通過使受害者懷疑自己的感知、記憶和現實感來獲得控制權。煤氣燈效應這一術語起源於1944年的電影《煤氣燈》(Gaslight),該電影講述了一名男子試圖使他的妻子懷疑自己的心智健康,以控制她的財產。 煤氣燈效應的施加者的目標:煤氣燈效應的主要目的是讓受害者對自己的感受、記憶和判斷產生懷疑,從而使操作者獲得更多的控制力。 煤氣燈效應通常表現為否定受害者的經歷、故意製造混亂、否認承諾或事實、轉移責任、故意隱瞞或歪曲信息等手法。 受到煤氣燈效應操縱的人可能會感到焦慮、疑惑、自我懷疑,甚至可能對自己的精神健康產生擔憂。長期受到煤氣燈效應操縱的人可能出現自尊心降低、抑鬱、焦慮等心理健康問題。 煤氣

【閱讀筆記】平行世界愛情故事

【閱讀筆記】平行世界愛情故事

Goodreads:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 3.8星 Nico  評  星:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 3星 作者:東野圭吾 中文翻譯:王蘊潔 ISBN:9789573332534 博客來連結:按此跳轉 當推理小說作家遇上科技主題,大概就是這樣吧? 故事細節滿有趣的,整本小說基本上是兩個非常相似、但存在著某種『設定上不同』的細節再往前走。閱讀的時候真的會覺得是兩個平行世界的故事:兩個世界,只存在著一個差異,但卻走到非常不同的結果。 小說的組成方式就是一個章節是故事線A、接下來的是故事線B,故事線A、B描述的似乎是同一個時間點,卻完全不同的故事。如果你剛好有大約兩小時的時間,想要找一本壓力不大但主題有趣的書,可以考慮『平行世界愛情故事』 ====以下有雷警告分界線==== 感覺比起以往其他東野圭吾的作品,這本小說的主題內容似乎有一點超乎作者本身對科技技術的認知?主題很有趣,但對科技的描述非常少。以至於後來看到男二等同是自殺式的抹除自己記憶,還期待本來在智力輸男二的主角可以做出技術上的突破、讓男二恢復正常醒過來⋯⋯這不覺得太強人所難,而且不合理嗎? 女主角在故事線B上,一開始裝作從沒跟男二交往過也很不